Groups
Groups and group dynamics
There are a number of elements I want to put into this section. The
section will include theorists like Tuckman
(below),
Lewin - Bates & Johnson - Bennis & Shepard - Bion - Homanson
this page etc.,
influence of NTL approaches, different forms of group work, models,
dynamics, psychoanalytic approaches, group work techniques, facilitation.
Just added Group Decision Making Theory
Group Development Stages
Over 100 theoretical models of group development exist however each
tend to represent a variation of a basic four-stage model: formation,
control, work, ending.
These stages can serve as general guideposts for any group work leader,
as long as it is remembered that any one group can vary in how it proceeds
through the stages.
B.W.Tuckman
addressed how groups change over time and his model is seen as the basis for examining group stages.
All groups go through a series of stages of development before performing
in a fully mature and effective manner and a team develops from individuals
through a series of stages in accordance with the shared experiences of
its members.
He identified four stages of team development
that have been adopted by other researchers.
Forming
The group is not yet a group, simply a collection of individuals. At this
stage, the purpose of the group is discussed along with its title, composition,
leadership and life-span. Individuals will be keen to establish their
personal identities in the group and make some impression on others. Important
mechanisms include developing trust, finding similarities, setting up
'rules' and norms, 'contracting' with group members, finding out if 'this
is the group for me' etc. attraction bonds, orientation to others, dependency,
inclusion. Team members become acquainted with each other, information
is exchanged. They determine each team member's strengths and assign roles
and responsibilities.
Storming
Most groups go through a stage of conflict following the initial, often
false, consensus. Purpose, leadership, roles and norms may all be challenged.
Hidden agendas may be revealed, and some interpersonal hostility is to
be expected. If successfully handled, storming leads to the formulation
of more realistic objectives, procedures and norms. This stage is particularly
important to the formation of trust within the group even though it is
characterised by dissatisfaction, competition, conflict , fight, counterdependency.
Members jockey for position, become aware of their differences and try
to determine how they will work together.
Norming
The group establishes norms and patterns of work within which it functions.
There will be a lot of tentative experimentation by individuals testing
the temperature of the group and establishing their levels of commitment
- development of structure, increased harmony. A group consensus emerges,
it comes to an agreement on its purpose or function. Members are clear
what their roles and responsibilities are. The group has a sense of identity
and members strive to work together.
Performing
Only when the previous three stages have been successfully completed
will the group reach optimum performance level. Achievement orientation,
productivity, group structure, norms, and behavior are understood and
accepted, members know how to work with each other. They can handle disagreements
and misunderstandings effectively. The group is focused on accomplishing
its purpose.
For a group in which the task is clearly defined and seen by all members
as highly important, the first three stages may be dealt with in the first
few hours of meeting. For most groups it takes longer and needs to be
anticipated. Managers of project teams (involving people from different
parts of the organisation) need to plan for and allow time for group development;
less time should be needed when members come together from within one
department.
Implications
1. Stage of group development influences other processes (e.g., cohesiveness,
conformity, production)
2. Interventions must take group's stage into account (e.g., leadership,
therapy)
3. Diagnosing stage group is at is important for facilitators and group
leaders:
Refs:
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological
Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small group development
revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419- 427.
AND MORE - Lewin - Bates & Johnson - Bennis & Shepard - Bion -
Homans - and Links here too
